The reasons for that collapse are complex, but military overspending certainly played a large part. We know now that the military superpower of the USSR, so fearful in his generation, did collapse politically. Of course, his technical discussion had, and has, intense ethical and political consequences. In his lecture, David Parnas was not mounting a political argument against the Strategic Defence Initiative, but illustrating why, technically, it was not feasible. Any errors of interpretation in this document are of course my own, and readers with a more substantial interest are advised to read David Parnas’s own collected essays on the topic, which are now available online. For that reason, it seems worthwhile to re-present them here, a generation later. At the time I found him highly persuasive, and nothing since, to my knowledge, has invalidated his technical arguments. Parnas seemed uniquely qualified to report on the Strategic Defence Initiative (S.D.I.). The notes to follow are my best attempt in 1986 as a non-specialist to outline a lecture given by David Lorge Parnas, a Canadian computer engineer and professor who spent years working on American defense projects. Judge for yourself how relevant it is to Star Wars II, millennium edition. Below is a computer engineer's report on the technical viability of Star Wars I, circa 1986.
#Will martin star wars revisited free
Like Mordor's ninth ring of power*, hidden forever deep in a dark river beneath a mountain, some Gollum was sure to chance upon it, and once set free it would again corrupt all who carelessly picked it up ( *J.R. nightmares, we knew that no toy of destruction, once conceived of, has ever been left to rest. But in our heart of hearts, in our 3 a.m. We pretended that flower power was winning. Please don't sue us.We kidded ourselves for a while that Star Wars had gone away. We ❤️ Star Wars and give it all the moneys. All Star Wars content, images, and likenesses are the property of their respective copyright owner. is not affiliated with Lucasfilm, 20th Century Fox, or Disney. Site content Copyright © 2003-2022 TEH Innernets LLC. JUST WAIT UNTIL THE COMMIES FIND OUT ABOUT ITĪuthor DuracellEnergizer Time 12:23 PM Post linkĥ6,927 members have started 22,414 topics with 1,120,880 posts since March 10, 2003 Where were you in '77? Author TV's Frink Time 8:26 AM Post link Someone's gonna get visited by the Men in Black pretty soon, methinks.Īuthor SilverWook Time 9:22 PM Post link Where were you in '77? Author DuracellEnergizer Time 9:19 PM Post link
Wouldn't that stuff still be classified after all these years though? Beware of buyers named Vlad.
Lucas unsuccessfully sued to discourage that association. It would be interesting if a defense contractor actually used the SW name for the Strategic Defense Initiative. Help get The Original Trilogy preserved! Author SilverWook Time 5:20 PM Post link Whereabouts in the world are you?īitcoin:13QDjXjt7w7BFiQc4Q7wpRGPtYKYchnm8x I am happy to scan the footage for you free of charge, which would likely increase its value as you could offer a digital copy of it along with the film. Whether it is Lucas' Star Wars, or Reagan's Star Wars, it is still of interest. Well, 1983 would most likely be the Reagan Star Wars initiative. Can you provide pictures of the casing?Ī Goon in a Gaggle of 'em Author poita Time 5:09 PM Post link Yeah, this sounds more like it's related to Reagan's "Star Wars" initiative as 005 said. Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress / Twitter Author bkev Time 3:18 PM Post link
I don't believe a word of this but I'd love to be proven wrong.Īuthor doubleofive Time 3:12 PM Post linkĭoes it also have Luke missing his first grappling hook throw? ROTJ Storyboard Reconstruction Project Author Jetrell Fo Time 3:05 PM Post link
Its all the cut outs (edits) of the original star wars just found outĪuthor timdiggerm Time 2:28 PM Post link ROTJ Storyboard Reconstruction Project Author asemechanic76 Time 2:10 PM Post link Yeah, but, as 005 said, Martin Marietta was a defense contractor. It i stamped on the reel and reel case star warsĪuthor timdiggerm Time 1:55 PM Post link Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress / Twitter Author asemechanic76 Time 1:42 PM Post link Star Wars Revisited Wordpress / Facebook / Twitter Trying to figure out what i have 1983 701 final cut of star wars Author asemechanic76 Date, 11:57 AM Author asemechanic76 Time 11:57 AM Post linkĬAN SOMBODY HELP ME OUT fuji lot number 613336-26a 1 inch x 3170 ft 2.5 cmx 970 then on the case its stamped CONFIDENTIAL 613336-26A MARTIN MARIETA 701 CAN SOME ONE TELL ME WHAT ITS WORTH ? IT HAS NOT TURNED RED BEEN KEPT IN 52 DEGREE TEMPTURE FOR 35 YEARSĪuthor doubleofive Time 12:36 PM Post link Trying to figure out what i have 1983 701 final cut of star wars - Original Trilogy Sign In
0 kommentar(er)
